Can This Dude Really Win Your Presidential Vote?

30 10 2008

Turning left to Obama-Biden, I see a son and his father on the same ticket. And to right McCain-Palin, I see a father with his daughter; or more appropriately a boss and his bespectacled personal assistant. Needless to say, these presidential running mates are the wackiest combos at best to aim for the highest office. To make it worst, the mainstream media had it all twisted by making this election looks like a race between Obama and Palin – living the two white-haired dudes – McCain and Biden – in the smoke.

Exactly six days to go, it looks like infinity to Obama while the days click like seconds for McCain. If the election were conducted today, the pollsters say the black-haired dude would pull it off big-time! Thus, there is a legitimate reason for the white-haired candidate to gasp for every breath of air which appears deflating rapidly. From the grand scheme of things, only ‘Bradley-effects’ could toss-up this election. Otherwise, Barack could pull a landslide. Well, opinion polls can be very flattery sometimes; people just tell you what you what to hear or whatever comes to their mind. You get the picture, given the fact that ‘Obama’ is arguably the hottest name of this decade. The question is: are these pollees would actually walk their talk? If yes, then Obama gets a done deal.

On the other hand, McCain who assumed an ‘underdog’ title despite his elongated experience and age is not highly favored in recent polling surveys. Notwithstanding underdog appeal could factor in to sway voters to the losing guy’s corner – perhaps out of sympathy. But McCain can’t just bank on that alone. To resurrect as a comeback-kid, this dude needs to scram his overused maverick blabs. Extremists, radicals, and loners are how some people view mavericks. Such characteristics could scare off would-be supporters.

In addition, McCain need to lam that tax-cut bullshits and ‘spreading the wealth’ rhetoric. Most Americans are no-fools. Intelligent voters could be insulted when politicians beat the taxcut drum. It is like saying hey, I’m buying your votes for few hundred$ bucks. So what happens after that? George Bush’s hyped tax-cut and that never insulated the economy from recession. Well, except you are “Joe the Plumber” who made a big deal about paying his civic dues, tax-cut is not going to dent a whole lot of different in one’s life. Paying taxes is a civil responsibility. So get over it. And nothing wrong in spreading the wealth either. It is good for average Americans as most make less than $250,000/yr; and these folks are the main voting block anyway. Actually redistributing wealth would stimulateth the economy rather confining it to the opulence top ten percent. BTW, tax policy is all about spreading the wealth to lower class; it’s been that way for centuries. Therefore, ‘SpredingTheWealth’ fear tactic now adopted by McCain camp could favor his opponent as the argument makes McCain more pro wealthy than middle/working class.

As for the VPs, Joe Biden has his own missteps but he seems to hold it well overall. Other side, everything about Sarah Palin is overblown: from her cloths/hair style to the messed up interview. All fault to McCain’s strategists who tried to remake a made-woman. Kathy Curic ain’t God. I think Palin would have dealt perfectly with the media on her own if there were no strategic restrictions from her handlers. To diffuse unfit-for-office syndrome, she needs to take off those glasses, which stereotypically make her looks less presidential. Most Americans would prefer glassless iron-like lady (think Thatcher!) in the oval office than a softy.

On a more personal note, I don’t know who gets my vote in this election. Both candidates have proven worthy of the highest post. Simply saying I’m voting Obama because I am Black! would be a racial understatement. Same goes to any white dude. As days go, so are the emotions and tensions running high. Eventhough it seemly all set for Obama while McCain people pray for ‘Bradley effect’, the votes that count most due on November 4th. Voters should weigh important issues and vote with their heads. Either way, there would be millions of heartbreaks by this time next week. It’s not going to be the end of the world. President McCain or President Obama would serve United Statesjudiciously. Every citizen’s acceptance of either president would be a support, for nation, which would go a long way.

Have a nice vote.





Sarah Palin: “Wild Life” Runs in the Family

11 09 2008

Sara Palin, Bristol Palin aka gunhead, boozehead. So much for the so called “hockey mum” who is accusing the media for pointing out her family flaws. C’mon hottie, you are running for the highest in the land. Holding public office means subjecting yourself to scrutiny. You can’t just put a pretty face-on and expect Americans’ vote just like that. Actually, one has to be skeptic of pretty faces because 8 out of 10, they would have some form of skeletons in their closet.

To attest to such instance, the media have done some job exposing some of the plaques on Sarah Palin’ cheerleader appearance. A lady who prides herself as a mom; can her family exemplifies American family value? Hell no!! Not her with gun-loving record and alcohol drinking household (as she is shown, inset with some pot-smoking dude in the back ground). BTW, I never knew they wear bikini in frigid cold Alaska. And daughter, Bristol, display guns and gulping spirit like juice. Oh yeah! They can blame that on the weather too. In this age, there are many things teenagers can do in their time than having sex, messing with gun, or being a boozehead.

It is remains to be seen how the deeds of a “wild child” would affect the VP candidacy of a mother. It could be okay for an average citizen to party like animal with bottles of alcohol on both hand.s More also it is cool for ‘gun right’ advocates to  showoff  their arsenal for friends to see. But this type of indulgent could be a serious concern if it’s involved elected public figures.

There has been political rhetoric of “keeping the kids out” of political jabs. But who is to blame when a republican presumptive VP Sarah Palin can not control her teenagers – encouraging “unprotected Sex” to  pregnancy? The family we’ve seen since her nomination is as cosmetic as Sarah’s ‘lipstick’ – on a pig? Maybe. It wouldn’t be a surprise if there are more skeletons than what we have seen so far. I can only imagine how she can lead this nation with a ‘morally dysfunctional‘  family in the Whitehouse.

Sarah’s Parodies Below





Dick Cheney Wants Another Fight After 2 Wars

11 08 2008

I thick some leaders need to take cue from Abraham Lincoln who said “I destroy my enemies when I make them my friends.” Mr. Tough Guy, VP Dick Cheney is beating another war drum. With unfinished wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Cheney is talking tough about Georgian-Russian war which started last week. In a TV report yesterday, while President Bush made a softer tone that “we strongly condemn the bombing outside of South Ossetia, Dick Cheney said: “Russia’s military action against Georgia (in Europe) must not go unanswered.”

I think such a statement is undiplomatic and should not come from a guy who once avoided behind drafted to war. There are better ways to show solidarity for a country, not by bullying. As for the Russian, they have been put into the back-burner since the end of cold war while United States has been flexing military might all over the world. So a slight provocation gives the former Soviet Republic excuse to come back, a show of force to remind the world that Russia is a super power too, unfortunately at its neighbors’ peril.
(Picture above shows Russian tanks unit fired toward Georgia.)

 

 

Quote of the day:

“Force is all-conquering, but its victories are short-lived.” Abraham Lincoln





Nancy Pelosi’s Book: A Feminist Hypocrisy at Best

5 08 2008

So Nancy is on a tour book. It is unbelievable that the same lady who shot down Hillary Clinton’s Whitehouse run is promoting a book that entitled “Know Your Power: A Message to America’s Daughters” ($23.95). I haven’t perused the book; needless to say I would not buy it because the content would appear hypocritical.

A lot have been said about “glass ceiling” for women. It is a common belief that it is still a men’s world out there. So, it is refreshing to see some women making it to the top of their career, especially in conventional men’s domain. Nevertheless, I think women are still their own worst enemies of progress. When some get to the top, they want to be the only conspicuous lady robbing shoulder with powerful men. That is the case of Nancy Pelosi, the first lady in U.S. history to be elected House Speaker.

Yeah! Nancy’s achievement is a big deal. And seeing any woman making similar history [for even more powerful position] could deflate her ego. She enjoys the respect and attention given to her as the lady-of-the-house. Had Hillary Clinton got the Democratic nomination, she too would have become [presumptive] most powerful lady in Washington/U.S., a title currently held by Pelosi. That is why Nancy supported Barack Obama for the nomination. So where is the so-called “feminist spirit”? With Obama in Whitehouse, it’s like a ’strong lady and a wimp’ at the helm. Meaning Pelosi would be calling the shot for Democratic Party. With Iron-lady Hillary? Ah fogetaboutit! Pelosi wouldn’t stand a chance – as Hill takes bullshit from nobody.

With all the privilege and power, it is obvious Pelosi is having a blast in men-dominated world. So it is normal to act as a role model for other females to follow – but to share power with no other women. I can see another skilled politician (Nancy) at best. It is a known fact that most politicians don’t always mean what they say. Nancy Pelosi’s book-hawking parade is nothing but a “political marketing” and pretense. If she would have to be voted for again, so that some gullible voters would think: “Gee! She is lifting the bar for our daughters; let’s vote for her.”

My conclusive analogy would be Nancy Pelosi is just like some lady who sleeps with somebody else’s guy and turned around saying “all men are cheaters.” The fact of the matter is: men wouldn’t cheat on their lovers without the help of other women. Her book would say: girls, men are your problem; they are creating the glass-ceiling for you, they are limiting your career goals. You don’t have to let them.” Well, ladies you might find it very daunting to attain your ambition if you are in the same boat with ‘Nancy(s) Pelosi(s) of the world.’

——

QUOTE OF THE DAY:

“A feminist is a woman who does not allow anyone to think in her place.” — Michele Le Doeuff





Unwanted VA Beauty Becomes New York Queen

22 07 2008

This is a typical classic case of “one man’s garbage is another man’s treasure.” Obviously New York has good eyes for beauty than other cities in America. It is widespread seeing small-town hotties making it big, beyond their widest dream, after settling in New York. Leigh-Taylor Smith is a 22 yrs Virginia native who moved to Manhattan after losing some beauty contests in Virginia, for two consecutive years. Within a year in New York, she was crowned “Miss Brooklyn” last February. And yesterday, she won the State Crown for “Miss New York.” Not too bad for perhaps a village girl who relocated to NY last year. She’s vowed her next win would be Miss U.S.A, a title held by another small town girl, Tara Conner from Kentucky.

As this fate unfolded, many Virginians are proud of her. So exited they are that a major news headline in Virginia exclaimed: She’s from here!! She’s from here!!! Yeah right! losers; after you dumped her? But Ms Smith might not be getting too much love from many New Yorkers. There has been some residency issue since she won Miss Brooklyn. Luckily, she’s not an illegal alien; otherwise, some people could have asked for her deportation right away. Brooklynites had legitimate reason to beef on this. Why would they swallow the fact that someone who lives in Manhattan, another borough, and for less than a year could take away their crown just like that?  At the time, Ms. Smith couldn’t understand what the ado and hatred is all about. She once said: “I can’t believe all the ‘controversy’ of me taking the title back to Manhattan, I really didn’t expect it.” She told a Brooklyn news outlet.

The Brooklyn organizers came to her defense and issued a statement that they allowed outsiders to participate because there wasn’t enough interested candidates from Brooklyn. – OK, that is a lame excuse for the birds because I have seen better looking women in Brooklyn. – So what happened that this same lady went on to win the State title? Here is another reason from an executive of the New York pageant: “contestants must meet one of three prerequisites constructed by the Miss America Association: have permanent residency, be a full-time student or a full-time employee.”

That said, so out of sixteen contestants across the state of New York, there weren’t enough beautiful chicks? Or could we say because of the huge population here, native NY beauties have melted in the crowd that only  out-of-state hottie would stand out of many heads? Are we really looking closely enough? In my view, these successful non-NYKers (girls) have unparallel swagger that beats most NY beauties hands down. So, the judges must have been impressed by the girl’s attitude – that alone can make any lady stand out from a “sea of beauties.”

Hence, it’s no surprise that some city politicians, such as Anthony Weiner, want to enact laws that would allow easy flow of foreign beauties into New York show/fashion industry.  My advice to New York gals is: Polish Your Swagger!! Notwithstanding, I still love my NY girls; they are fun to be with and I wouldn’t trade them for some beautiful “country pumpkins.”

Quote of the day:
“Opportunity often comes disguised in the form of misfortune, or temporary defeat.” — –Napoleon Hill





Jesse Jackson called Black People ‘N*gg#rs’

17 07 2008

There is even worst language used by Rev. Jesse Jackson on Fox News that didn’t come out last week. Bill O’ Reilly now confirmed in another Fox show, yesterday, that Jackson called his own people n*ggers but the initial TV segment was filtered out. Here is what Jackson said: “Barack…is talking down to black people…telling the n*ggers how to behave.. I wanna cut his guts out.”

And according to TVNewser, O’Reilly said the reason why he did not want that part to surface is because: “I’m not in the business of hurting Jesse Jackson. And I’m not in the business of creating some kind of controversy that is not relevant to the general subject: one civil rights leader disparaging another, over policy. So we held it back [but] some weasel leaked it to the internet. That person wants to hurt Jesse Jackson.”

Oh! really, O’Reilly? This world would eventually be a better place if venomous Bill O’ Reilly can talk like that.

Initially, I think the language Jackson used about “guts” is not really a big deal; because this was a guy-to-guy talk. Men, no matter what background, use slangs, jargons and stuff like that when in the mist of their peers. It’s all bravado. However, such language shouldn’t be coming up from someone who wears a ‘clergy title’ on his sleeves.

How much more for Jesse to use racial slurs against the very people he claims to fight for. Isn’t the same Jackson, who advocated banning ‘N’ word, way before Rev Al Sharpton followed suit? Apparently, this isn’t going to be a race issue, but immoral, because Jackson is no Don Imus. So, Rev Al Sharpton should sharpen his rhetoric impartially against his long-time ally: he should start picketing at the Rainbow Coalition Headquarter, as a matter of cause.

BTW, Jesse Jackson had a legitimate reason [but another immoral issue] to vex as Obama teaches responsibility because, if you don’t know, Jackson had a “lovechild” out of wedlock with his assistant, Karin Stanford, Thus that make him absenteeism or partly irresponsible father. So, it is understandable why Obama’s speech hit some core. It was never about Jackson being jealousy of Barack Obama as widely buzzed.

———

There are always those who think they know what is your responsibility better than you do.” —-Ralph Waldo Emerson

“Rank does not confer privilege or give power. It imposes responsibility.” ——Louis Armstrong





Sex Bust: Principal Threesomed with 2 Men

16 07 2008

It’s all men affair. They were busted butt-naked while having 3-way sex on the grass. But one of them called Jim managed to escape the cops, still completely naked though. This really caught most Greenburgh residents by surprise because one of these men is a well respected Principal (photo inset) of a Roman Catholic School, Sacred Heart in Mount Vernon; and a married father of three – he is 41 yrs old Gabriel De Jesus. Jesus!!! Can you believe that? Unfortunately, the principal is losing his 6-figure$ job over this. The third man is Francesco Autera, 31, who works in finance. As reported the men met online @ ManHunt.net and Jim the ‘facilitator’ is being hunted by the police. What a coincident?

This incident begs the question: aren’t these men using their gumption? These are respected men with good jobs who can afford the best hotel rooms in town; instead they chose to get low under a backyard tree, like squirrels. Undoubtedly, public obscenity is becoming an epidemic nowadays. It is not uncommon to see people having sex in cars, in the parks, and sooner or later we’d see folks getting low right on curbs in broad daylight. What come to mind are some public figures such as singer George Michael and Republican senator Larry Craig who were caught, in the past, for soliciting men for sex in public locations.

Yes, it’s summertime in New York area, weather is hot, and horny folks might be tempted to get low under the sun or moon. But here is one good advice from Rebecca Baker of LowHud.com: “If you’re going to have group-sex, don’t do it outside.”…. You heard !! Take your ass indoor!

Quote of the day:

“Obscenity is whatever arouses or gives the Judge an erection.”—– Unknown





Obama & Wife Labeled as Terrorists

14 07 2008

With portrait of Osama Bin Laden in the Oval office, American flag is roasting in the fire place, Michelle Obama with AK-47 rifle on back and the presumptuous president Barack Obama wearing Taliban attire shown fist-japing each other. This is a portrayal of the Obamas by New Yorker Magazine and some people think it ain’t funny.

This is the kind of joke that one would expect from Fox News. or Conservative National Reviews. But on New Yorker ? C’mon.. that’s not what the magazine is all about. It’s like a slap on face for the mag’s subscribers who are predominantly Democrats. There are probably cartoons like this went unnoticed daily in many media outlets; but it is off mark for a major magazine to use such satiric picture as its issue cover.

Although the New Yorker’s editor, David Remnick, views the picture as sarcasm, tagged “Politics of Fear.” But Obama supporters are fuming and it was reported that “John McCain’s campaign joined the Obamanians in protesting: “We [McCain camp] completely agree with Obama campaign that it’s tasteless and offensive.” Personally, I think that is very kind of McCain’ people to condemn such portrayal.

Even though I am  not rooting for Obama , I found it disturbing to portray his wife in terrorist imagery. New Yorker is a respected and one of my favorite magazines. I am disappointed by this image of distortions.  Actually the magazine was sort of rooting for Obama before and now he is being tagged as a flip-flopper, which might be true but not with a pic that gives reciprocal effect on the real story. BTW, this  is not the first time the magazine pull this kind of satire; few years ago, its cover portrayed Monica Lewinsky as Mona Lisa.

Quote of the day:

“Hypocrisy and distortion are passing currents under the name of religion” —- Gandhi





A Woman’s Breast Bra Served As A Bat Nest

10 07 2008

It’s romantic when ladies, in general, feel exotic touches on their succulent breasts, especially from lovely men. But it could be a bizarre feeling when the touch comes from one of the ugliest animals on earth: a bat! According to BBC, that’s what happened to an hotel receptionist, Abbie Hawkins, who unknowingly accommodated a bat on breast for five hours before realizing it.

When she felt something vibrating in her bra, she thought it was her cell phone. As she later pulled it out, she got the shock of her life as a bat came out rearing its ugly head. She has no idea where the stranger came from or how it got into the warm comfort of her  “juicy double”. Nevertheless, Ms. Hawkins later said: “[eeh! it tickles..] I felt quite sorry for it. Perhaps I should have left it there and given it a good home.”

Really, the ‘baby bat’ must have been sucking milk from Ms Hawkins’ breast; and now she is having a maternal emotion for it – to keep as a baby. But unfortunately the bat flew away thinking no “hotel accommodation”. What a lost!!

Quote of the day:

“There is a passion for hunting something deeply implanted in woman breast.” —- Charles Dickens

Read Full Story





Three Governors’re Down, Another One’s Hanging

30 05 2008

Few events that unfolded within the first half of this year make me wonder what is going on in New York State of mine. As a result, my mind keeps flashing back to a book I once red “Where Have All The leaders Gone” by Lee Iacocca. The tune in that book is very blunt and direct. Iacocca was one of the most powerful and effective honchos in corporate world. Simply put, he is the Jack Welch of the auto industry. In the book, he basically criticizes dwindling moral value, lack of ethics, and undiplomatic attitude of the U.S. political leaders. Even though, the book seemed to focus more on what is going on in Washington DC, the overall theme shows leadership flaws and misconducts around the nation. Perhaps, elected official are more suicidal (in their responsibilities) than depressed citizens. I mean, what could make leaders, who seemingly have it all, do dump things such as corruption or philandering.

Within the last few years in New York and the tristate area, we had Gov. John Rowland of Connecticut which was convicted for corruption. Two years later, Jim McGreevey of New Jersey came out of the closet and resigned due to his sexual orientation. Then came recently the biggest: the empire state’s Emperor Eliot Spitzer was canned for ‘hooker-banging”. As it turned out, Spitzer’s replacement, David Patterson, is no saint either; his unofficial inaugurations speeches was tainted with his sexual exploits including how we, the tax-payers, are footing his erotic indulgence. It actually had to take the intervention of some news editorials such Westchester’s Journal News and The NY Daily News’ Mike Lupica to zip the new governor’s chattering. Apparently, Gov. Patterson takes pleasure in talking about how he got laid – by women, however he’s fair enough to fully support gay marriage.

Naturally, some men stroke their own ego by talking about how many ladies they have conquered, but we really don’t want to hear such vaunts from our elected leaders. Sexual conquest might have shown the measure of a man in the biblical age – remember King Solomon’s over 800 wives/concubines; in today’s society such habit amounts to nothing but weakness or sickness. Now, David Patterson should be worrying about potential political opponents if he wants to seek election at the end of his term.

The democrats have every reason to be concerned about the next New York gubernatorial election. Apart from governor’s sex scandal, there is a health issue which could be factored into his ability to remain in office for long. Hopefully, Gov. Patterson would get a ‘clean bill of health’ from his scheduled eye operation in July. Wishing him the best.

——–

“If you lose people’s trust, you lose every thing.” — Unknown





Despite Husband’s Sex Scandal, Silda Spitzer Still Shines

26 05 2008

Despite the pain and embarrassment caused by her husband’s sex tryst, Silda Spitzer came out this past week looking very beautiful and better than most Hollywood actresses. Coincidentally, she appeared on the same NY Sunday Daily News page#3 (hard copy) with American’s most overrated actress, Sarah Jessica Parker of “Sex and the City.” However, Mrs. Spitzer stands out from all the celebrities on that page gallery, including Naomi Campbell.

When the whole world gone Spitzer-bashing, there are good reasons why I did not really go with flow. Except a quick reference to Eliot Spitzer in recent article “Why Ugly Guys Are So Hot.” Some times, you can’t really get between husband and wife no matter what. From distant, it is easy for Andrea Peysers of the world to call Eliot Spitzer all kinds of derogatory names under the sun [scumbag, bum, dog, cheater, liar, terrorist abuser, psychopath, lowlife, etc, etc]. NY Post’s Andrea Peyser, and her media gang from other outlets, ran continuous articles encouraging Silda Spitzer to leave her husband. But only Mrs. Spitzer and her family know better; and it is good that she did not fall for media criticism of her husband. And I wonder how those critics feel now that they see her beaming and looking charming – no stress- as ever.

While there is no moral value in extramarital affair, we should remember that most famous marriages don’t always break because the husbands are cheating. Eleanor Roosevelt and Hilary Clinton survived; even Jacqueline (Jackie) Kennedy would have survived it if John F Kennedy was caught red-handed with Marylyn Monroe. So would Silda Spitzer survive too. The effectiveness of the over-used cliché “media can break you” might have waned in today’s society. In family crisis, people are putting loves first. It takes a strong lady to use media outrage to her own advantage. Silda Spitzer chose to turn the table. Her husband gave heartbreak but she forgave and never let media hypercritics break her family apart.

Above pic: Silda Spitzer, Ali Wentworth & George Stephanopoulos

——-

“Two important things are to have a genuine interest in people and to be kind to them. Kindness, I’ve discovered, is everything.” —- Isaac Bashevis Singer





African Witchcraft! Real Cat Women: Ain’t No Halle Berry’s Bullshit

25 05 2008

Being a native African, I can tell you that there are some pets which my people aren’t fond of at all. Owls and Cats would top the list of Africans’ most hated pets, but favorite of witchcraft for their agility and scary looks. That is, ghoulish individuals could transform into cats or owls in order to travel long distant for their vampire mission. So, it is no surprise that in a Nigerian coastal city of Port Harcourt, a biker ran down a group of cats with no guilt; but as it turned out, those travelling cats (one of them inset) are human assassins on routine bloody assignments.

Click here for full story: Cat Woman for real!!

Acted-up cat woman, Halle Berry>

————-

“The more original a discovery, the more obvious it seems afterwards.” —Arthur Koestler





A Slut Keeps Basking in Cheap Publicity

13 05 2008

 

I just red a piece on DomainNameNews.com, Ashley Dupre the hooker having some gut to sue GirlsGoneWild and some domainers for “cybersquatting” ?. She got to be kidding. Cyber Squatting is when someone registers a name closely similar to yours and hope to gain from traffic generated from typos or mistypes. I found this law suit ridiculous and I think it would be an uphill battle for Ashley Dupre and her legal team.

As a matter of fact, the name “Dupre” is an adopted name- not her real surname. She was born “Ashley Rae Youmans” and later took on her mother maiden name “DiPietro” and then to “Dupre”. In my view, she is the one cyber-squatting here because as a wananbe-singer she probably took the name ‘Dupre’ to mimic and with hope that Jermaine Dupri’s success would rob off on her. Jermaine Dupri is Janet Jackson’s fiancé and a mega rapper/super producer behind several hits such, as from Lil Wayne, Mariah Carey, TI, Da Brat and other.

Another legal question is that: Does she have the name trademarked? This legal action appears as a stunt from a shameless ’slut’ who is looking for cheap publicity. Enjoy her show!

———-

”Prostitution happens to you because of troubles you had. In reality no woman would choose to do that.” —–Catherine Deneuve





I Like Big Bibles, I Can’t Lie

13 05 2008

Since the unprecedented emergence of YouTube.com, there has been explosion of YouTube wannabes. It appears some people have been creating just about any word with “tubic” ending. ’Tube’ has become one of the most used word in cyberspace given the numbers of website names with ‘tubic’ attachments. There is UTube.com which apparently was selling metal tube-piles, before YouTube came to life, but fell victim of unwanted popularity and was compelled to sell the name to opportunists who now provide services (some porn-like) similar to Youtube. Then there is YouTube.net which has parlayed its traffic into porno contents. And there are skew of Ls, Xs, or Ns Tube.com, to mention just a few, which are cyber-squatting or not necessary operating in good faith.

Thank God, someone smart enough to create GodTube.com as reported on NYTimes. Even though, there is rival name SatanTube, GodTube seems to be doing very well among the ‘tubic’ video sites with exception of the pioneer, Youtube. Personally, I like the motivating and hilarious contents GodTube provides compare to some useless contents that crowd YouTube. For religious folks who are wary of cyberspace, GodTube might be a perfect place to check, maybe to unwind. The following are some interesting videos on GodTube duplicated by Youtube.

Baby Got Book

9 Rules To Date My Daughter

———

“It ain’t those parts of the Bible that I can’t understand that bother me, it is the parts that I dounderstand.” —-Mark Twain





The Angry Black Men You Ain’t See Yet

29 04 2008

In the United States, it’s not uncommon to describe people of color who protect their civil right as “angry black men”. If you have ever wondered what makes a black man angry, I think this is it: Sean Bell’s murder trial and the justice that followed. Usually the media are quick to judge Rev. Al Sharpton as troublemaker or instigator. When we look at what happens at Manhattan courthouse last Friday, we should be rethinking that Rev. Al Sharpton’s so-called confrontational protests are not too overbearing after all. While I don’t think Sean Bell’s murder was racially motivated, I do think there was excessive use of force (50 shots) against Bell and his two armless friends. Many people across racial lines would agree that if the victims were white Justice Arthur Cooperman wouldn’t have acquitted all the accused NYPD detectives.

.

In any case, how come the law is so whacked that defenders can easily waive rights to have grand jury deliberate over the case rather than a lone judge’s decision. This is the type of justice maneuver that cans the disadvantaged and breeds “angry black men” in United States. In other words, the justice system could easily ignore or not believe black man’s testimony; thus put him at disadvantage. There are many cases of black men convicted of the crime they never committed but later be acquitted thanks to the DNA technology. Despite weighing the evidence presented, perhaps the judge reached the verdict with stereotypic mind set.

.

With the outcome of Bell’s case, one should remember why there could be anger in the black communities. Next time you experience a black man’s outrage (hopefully you wouldn’t) remember how unfair the justice has been to many of them, their family member, and their acquaintances. I don’t think anyone is winning in this case. Sadly, both sides should brace for long litigations because if Al Sharpton sees “no justice there would be no peace” of mind for the police officers involved.

Quote of the day:

“No race can prosper till it learns that there is as much dignity in tilling a field as in writing a poem.” —Booker T. Washington





The Smartest Beggar in the City

25 04 2008

One of the NYC’s sharpest dressed persons happened to be a street beggar (not like one on the left). This is guy “thinks outside the box” as far as panhandling is concerned. NYTimes’ videoman, Corey Kilgannon describes the beggar as managing “his work flow with the efficiency of a well-trained middle manager.”

…….

Actually you don’t have to be a beggar to use this street beggar’s approach; one or two things can be learned from his style. Here he’s quoted as saying in  New York Times:

“Most guys think the more raggedy they look, people will feel sorry for them and give them more money. That’s a loser’s mentality, and it doesn’t work. Just because I like to dress clean, doesn’t stop people from giving to me. The way I dress says, ‘I live a clean life,’ and people would rather help that person because they know they’re not going to waste it, go and spend it on drugs or alcohol. They say they love the way I look. They say I’m the only panhandler [beggar] that keeps clean. And I don’t hassle nobody; they like that.”

If this guy is in a place like a third world country, he would have made enough to build or buy house(s) by now. But that might be difficult here in U.S. because of too much bills. The reason why I am saying this is that I have seen some street beggars in developing nations that have parlayed their acts into building houses and sending their dependents to college. This might sound ridiculous to some but it is happening; there are cases in which beggars make more money easily than people with regular jobs. Like every thing in life this gig had its pros and cons. So if you want to moonlight or aspire to be street beggar, you might want to give Mr. Baker Howard of Queens NY a call for consultation. Good luck.

Check Out His Full Video Here

———-

Never stand begging for what you have the power to earn.” — Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra





NY Post Excels at Pictures Misrepresentation

24 04 2008

When it comes to photo propaganda, there is no other news-print that does this sleazy game better than New York Post. You don’t want NY Post paparazzi around when you’re having a “bad hair day” or when you’re feeling down because your ‘mug shot’ could make the headline for wrong reasons. So what is wrong with the pictures in this entry?

 

I picked up a copy of NY Post this morning, I can’t believe what I saw: a sexy picture of Ashley Dupri, Spitzer’s call girl; again? It’s been over five weeks since Gov. Spitzer’s scandal and the guy had retired and moved on. But it appears that NY Post is the only news print around that wouldn’t stop beating the dead horse. The news paper never stopped running and re-running ‘spiterized’ articles over and over again. Today’s headline reads “Two On One’ Vs Spitzer”; however, this story has no direct link to Spitzer’s famous mistress, Ashley Dupri. This was a separate incident with no proof that the hooker in question worked for the same Emperor VIP Club. Although, it is about Eliot Spitzer, and another slut, but it a gross distortion to show the infamous Ashley’ pic to represent another (faceless) whore.

……

 

Also, some where in the paper is another distorting pictures NYC speaker, Christine Quinn (above). The snapshot captured her closing her eyes while answering reporters’ question, apparently overwhelmed by the recent discretionary funds scandal while trying to find answer in avalanche of questions. But NY post has been running this ‘sleepy’ picture consecutively for many days, ever since the scandal broke, even for other articles in which the speaker’s name never mentioned. Whatever happens to her better pictures such as this

……

 

I think one would agree that it is getting more difficult these days to differentiate New York Post from the London tabloids and Hustler Magazine.

—————

“What we have to do, what at any rate it is our duty to do, is to revive the old art of Lying.” —–Oscar Wilde

 





Alicia Keys Transfigured into a Bad Girl?

12 04 2008

Alicia, the BadThe last time I saw my girl, Alicia Keys, live was about three years ago, at the Nassau Coliseum when she performed as guest star at Beyonce’s concert. Looking at her fully clothed, unlike Beyonce who let it all hang out, I couldn’t help but admired Alicia Keys for her saintly look and beauty. The audience responses were overwhelming; she actually stole the show from the ‘foxy’ Beyonce. This basically means female entertainers don’t have to dress like hustlers to make strong impact on the music audience. Surprisingly, despite her vast success, Alicia Keys has recently resulted to erotic dresses. Heck!! Who want to see your butt or boobs? We just want to listen to your good music. Those sexy dresses might have worked Beyonce, Rihanna, Ciara and other ass-shakers but that is not you, Alicia babe. 

(Upper picture reps the ‘bad girl’ Alicia. The below reps the ‘decent’ we used to know)

Alicia, the DecentAs if the half-naked dresses aren’t doing enough dents, now sweet Alicia Keys wants to become a modern day Black-Panther. AP reported that Alicia Keys is transforming her self from a romantic to political singer. “She now wears AK-47 chains on her neck,” the report said. She is being spurred by some ridiculous conspiracy spins, such as government encouraged the gangster rap conflict that killed two hip-hop greats, B.I.G and Tupac. Well, Ms. Keys, regardless of how many books you red or researches you have done; your government/gangster rap conspiracy theory is a nobrainer. I don’t think US Government or FBI gave rappers ammo to kill each others. At least, no authority gave Ice T, Ice Cube, and Dr. Dre’s NWA mics or guns to start gangster rap. Back in the 80s, before gangster rap, there were hip-hop groups with clean lyrics. Thanks to the pioneers like SugarHill Gang, Grand Master Flash/Furious 5. Even the political rappers likes Chuck D and Public Enemy never rhythmed killing with guns or calling women hos.

The only conspiracy in hip-hop is the deliberate attempt in the industry to get violent, coupled with expletive lyrics to attract media attention. It is such strategy that made likes of Eminem, 50 cent, Dr. Dre, Snoop Dog and others became multi-millionaires today. I could go on this topic for hours; in short, the violence in hip-hop is self-inflicted, strategically plotted by the rappers and their promoters to draw attention and make money out of it.

Moreover, it’s good to remember that hip-hop music became fully “mainstream” after the death of Tupac Shakur and Notorious B.I.G. So who are the reapers here? Consequently, P. Diddy, former B.I.G’s promoter became famous worldwide and currently on his way to becoming a billionaire. So, Alicia Keys ’sweetie’ wants us to believe that government is the gainer in the hip-hop game?

People don’t need Alicia Keys to use her music fame to teach about civil rights. Before she ever came to the surface of this planet, there had been great leaders such as late Dr. Martin Luther King, late Malcolm X, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Rev. Al Sharpton and other who have been and still doing stellar jobs of fighting inequality. Without the struggles of these leaders, Obama wouldn’t have the courage to run for President office and most minority high-archivers wouldn’t have made it to the top of their careers today.

As it is said in the media that “Alicia Keys was born into the wrong era” because of the nature of her songs which sound so 1960ish – but I love it though. Perhaps, this is what prompted her to look at today’s struggle as if we were in the Black-Panther haydays. If Alicia Keys wants to join the civil right struggle, she would be better off donating money to the causes and be an occasional advocate rather than turning her concert(s) into political protest Arena.

_________________

Digging for facts is better mental exercise than jumping to conclusions.” – Bernard Baruch

UPDATE: Alicia Keys Quickly Back-pedals From Gangster Rap’s Conspiracy Theory. Read more. MSNBC>>





McCain-Condoleezza: A Ticket Made In Heaven

28 03 2008

It is obvious that John McCain is being swept under the media waves by Obama’s éclat, to the extent that some Americans and people overseas don’t even know who John McCain is. So, what can the poor American war hero do catch up with high-flying Obama? A sensation. mccain_story1.jpgcondoleezza-rice-newarticle1.jpgAccording to this morning CBS Radio report, John McCain might be considering Condoleezza Rice as a running mate. This looks like a smart idea because Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have been so hyped on the apriorism of making history – to be the first black president and first woman president respectively. McCain is at disadvantage of these Democrats’ history-making brouhahas. It is time for him to turn the table. Choosing Condi as a potential vice president is like killing “two birds with one stone.” Condi can help the republicans deflate the excitements surrounding Obama and Clinton. Condi is black and a woman. And she could be the first of both as a Vice President. Americans could be bought on campaign that would let McCain rule for fours years and then have the first black and woman president.

The two democratic contenders, while still trading jabs, need to watch out for McCain-Rice combo which can be very strategic. This could erase the democratic lead over the repuplicans’ as McCain’s surly attitude could be overlooked with Condi on his side. Condi is well-liked globally. Her professional resume is longer than Obama’s and Clinton’s combined; and she is the most educated official in the Bush Administration, if not in the whole Republican Party. To mention just a few, she rocks with the world leaders. Who can beat her records in Washington DC? Arguably none!  

Moreover, black folks could express to Condi the same emotions they have for Obama. And the feminists could be as excited to flock to Condi’s ticket as they are toward Hillary. If McCain eventually pull the stunt, it could be a major media sensation that could kill both Obamaniac and Clintoniac crazes. And the caveat? McCain-Rice would keep U.S. Troops in Iraq, at least, for the next decade(s).

________   

“My parents had me absolutely convinced that you may not be able to have a hamburger at Woolworth’s, but you can be President of the United States”   - Condoleezza Rice.





French Giant Allowed to Outdo its American Rival

7 03 2008

Lately, United States diplomacy has been bad-rapped on global scale. This is primarily because of the Bush administration’s war policy. As a result, some U.S. allies had turned to bitching antagonists; e.g. French former president openly criticized U.S. war in Iraq. However, the newly elected French President, Nicolas Sarkozy had normalized U.S – French relationship during a recent visit to United State.

Given the fact that France are among the major opposers of the U. S. war efforts, who would have thought that a French company, Airbus -EADS, would be allowed to bid for a major military contract in U.S. I mean, while the relationship was still strained between the two countries over war in Iraq. Isn’t this an irony? Here is why it is: France did not support United State war efforts and ended up winning one of the most lucrative defense contracts in U.S. history – $37 billion-up deal which could balloon to $100 billion at completion. Adding salt to the injury, this contract was awarded at the expense of an American company, Boeing, one of the most reputable companies on the planet.

I know some would argue that America is free market, which is what capitalism is all about; the foreign companies are involved with U.S. partners, and yari! ya! riya! For instance, today’s New York Times editorial supports the contract, citing backlash from the Europeans if U.S. kill the deal. According to the NY Times, “Boeing claimed that if it had won the contract, it would have created 44,000 jobs in this country. The [Airbus] EADS-Northrop group says its tanker will support [not create] 25,000 jobs here.” Then the editorial concluded that if the deal is prevented “It would also be bad diplomacy and bad business. And that can’t be good for the country.” Sorry Times, that argument is not strong enough to give American jobs away.

Yes, U.S. is open to foreign businesses and that is part of what make this country great. But this is an intelligence (military) contract that should be fully made in America, at least, for security reasons. Besides, it’s about tens of $billions of tax-payers’ money which should remain in the U.S. economy instead of France. In logic, other super powers would not award such contracts such to outsiders except if their indigenous defense contractors are absolutely incompetence. Boeing can have its flaws, tell me which great company wasn’t built on trials and errors. Boeing should have learned some lessons and the company can measure up to Airbus-EADS, if not better.

Clearly, no defense contract in any nation can be awarded without consent from its policy makers. As reported, some powerful politicians, including John McCain, facilitated the deal in favor of the Airbus & Co. One the hand, Senator Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama favor the American Boeing company. I think concurring with the latter makes more economic sense for United States. Senator McCain’s lack of economy knowledge can not be excused, especially in the forthcoming presidential debates.

——————————-

The world would be happier if its leaders had more vision and fewer nightmares.” – Vern McLellan (WWQ)

UPDATES: The Fights continue on this contract as of June 18. More reports in the following links:

Audit Says Tanker Deal Is Flawed (NY Times)

McCain: Tanker report unfortunate for taxpayers (NYT)

Boeing wins key round in Air Force tanker protest (AP)

U.S. Auditors Bash Air Force Over Refueling Tanker (Reuters)